<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ontology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/</link>
	<description>Dogs, lesbians, and children generally like me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-829</guid>
		<description>That is true.  That&#039;s why they say so many hilarious things in Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true.  That&#8217;s why they say so many hilarious things in Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anaglyph</title>
		<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>anaglyph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I doubt that many at Conservapedia would understand the Uncyclopedia joke. For a start Conservative Christians have very little in the way of sense of humour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that many at Conservapedia would understand the Uncyclopedia joke. For a start Conservative Christians have very little in the way of sense of humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Anaglyph: I DID find that very interesting.  I also find it a little hilarious that they are devoted to cataloguing the &quot;truth without bias,&quot; which as far as I can tell, is whatever the most pious person believes at the time.  I wonder how the Pharisees would have handled this technology.

This is interesting:

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

DC: It&#039;s sort of a terrible post. But I am proud of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anaglyph: I DID find that very interesting.  I also find it a little hilarious that they are devoted to cataloguing the &#8220;truth without bias,&#8221; which as far as I can tell, is whatever the most pious person believes at the time.  I wonder how the Pharisees would have handled this technology.</p>
<p>This is interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia</a></p>
<p>DC: It&#8217;s sort of a terrible post. But I am proud of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Colt</title>
		<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Colt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-824</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m drunk, so I can&#039;t really get a good read on what you wrote. But, I sense you said something worthwhile...so, I&#039;m here to give you an &quot;atta-boy.&quot; 

I read that Atheism entry the other day when you threw it my way. And, I stand by my original comment: Conservapedia is one step below Encyclopedia Dramatica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m drunk, so I can&#8217;t really get a good read on what you wrote. But, I sense you said something worthwhile&#8230;so, I&#8217;m here to give you an &#8220;atta-boy.&#8221; </p>
<p>I read that Atheism entry the other day when you threw it my way. And, I stand by my original comment: Conservapedia is one step below Encyclopedia Dramatica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anaglyph</title>
		<link>http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/ontology/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>anaglyph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voxproletariat.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Nice rant. Particularly the demolition of the ontological argument via relationships.

As far as the Conservapedia &#039;Atheism&#039; entry - don&#039;t you find it kind of peculiar that religious people (for surely, visits from folks like you and me notwithstanding, they must be the most usual enquirers) are so intrigued by it? Hmm, and what&#039;s this we see: the #3 most popular entry after the Main Page and &#039;Atheism&#039; is... &#039;Homosexuality&#039;...

So very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rant. Particularly the demolition of the ontological argument via relationships.</p>
<p>As far as the Conservapedia &#8216;Atheism&#8217; entry &#8211; don&#8217;t you find it kind of peculiar that religious people (for surely, visits from folks like you and me notwithstanding, they must be the most usual enquirers) are so intrigued by it? Hmm, and what&#8217;s this we see: the #3 most popular entry after the Main Page and &#8216;Atheism&#8217; is&#8230; &#8216;Homosexuality&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>So very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
